Wednesday, September 2, 2015

Mentoring through Feedback

One reading for this week included Sommers and Satz's article "Novice to expert: writing the freshman year." This included a detailed look at how students evolve in their writing over their four years at university, and what characteristics students who greatly improved their writing share with each other. These students who really grew as writers accepted their statuses as novices in their fields (at least initially), and also saw their writing as having a bigger purpose than just fulling requirements for an assignment. The authors discussed the importance of students seeing themselves as novices-- as beginning apprentices with a lot to learn about the discipline and its discourse. They also must see their papers as having a larger purpose in the course of their lives and their education. Grasping these concepts gives them the opportunity to really engage and look for ways to grow as they learn more in their classes over the years. Professors play an important role in helping student achieve these things. By developing interesting assignments and really treating students as newly arrived apprentices needing to learn the ropes, they create a dynamic of respect and foster learning. They give students an introductory sense of academic belonging that will lead and motivate them throughout college and beyond.
   
One way teachers can begin to treat students as emerging mentors is by creating meaningful feedback that helps students understand the "get and give" aspect of writing, rather than just seeing it as something they must do to get a grade. Feedback creates a dialog and helps students see that they have a valued voice in the field (or at least the beginnings of one) and that there is someone who is interested in reading what they have to say. This concept is also emphasized throughout the other readings we have read from Sommers' book. In most all of her chapters, including the ones we read for today, she stresses the importance of minimal feedback that really addresses the writer as a person, not the writing as a problem to fix. She recommends focusing on one lesson we want our students to learn overall, rather than creating a whole bunch of small corrections that they may or may not understand. This idea of treating the student more as a peer or an apprentice that you are guiding, and helping them to view themselves as such, will help them enormously in the grand scheme of their writing careers.

5 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. (whoops, typo in my first attempt!)

    "These students (...) also saw their writing as having a bigger purpose than just fulling requirements for an assignment."

    I feel like this is a big thing I want to keep in mind, Zanna. I found during introductions the first week, which included my students and I having a (very all-encompassing, but vague of course) conversation "about writing," that when I challenged them to give me a major (and then career field) where writing (and critical thinking, analysis, etc.) did NOT play a big or even small role, things got very interesting. I like also how the idea of keeping students aware that there is a "bigger picture" behind assignments kind of ties-in to what we were saying in class today about keeping the class as a whole aware of the fact that writing is a "process"---and that like any process, there are stages to go through (one of which is practice).

    Sorry about all the parentheses.

    Thanks for the post!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like this idea of the "get and give;" it's so true! It's also interesting when thought of in terms of Facebook because they're looking to get immediate feedback. When they look at our feedback at something they have to wait a few days to receive, it makes doing things in class, such as peer reviews of papers, that much more conducive to how their environment's been fostering their ways of thinking. The feedback is immediate, most likely from someone of a similar age, and providing an environment where they can be mentors to one another, not unlike social media.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Zanna, I would be interested to see what you think about these pieces as you begin to work with multilingual writers. I'd especially be interested to see what you think about the feedback for ESL writers ala Sommers. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Also, how do you see Roberts and Roberg's work on peer reveiw/collaborative work fitting in here?

    ReplyDelete